|
|
Post by VAN*LLA on Jun 10, 2010 5:36:18 GMT -5
The Special Children play an integral role in the Supernatural television series as well as On the Wing. However, I have noted that the special children are often disregarded by members and remain available characters on the canon list. My question is:
Should I retain the canon special children or allow seven original special children?
V A N I L L A ♥
|
|
|
|
Post by Dean Winchester on Jul 11, 2010 23:21:53 GMT -5
My thoughts are canon main goal, original secondary. But originals are important for variouty too. Just really depends.
|
|
|
|
Post by VAN*LLA on Jul 12, 2010 23:02:47 GMT -5
I would prefer the canon special children; however, I would like the plot to move quickly and nobody ever seems to be interested in these roles. At least with original special children it would most likely guarantee that the spots would be filled.
I would like to hear everyone's thoughts though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sam Winchester on Jul 13, 2010 1:33:55 GMT -5
I too say to have canons...but also have originals too, that way there is a mix of canon and original. I mean since its AU they can be different than they were.
|
|
|
|
Post by VAN*LLA on Jul 13, 2010 9:15:38 GMT -5
The only canons I plan on replacing are the special children (Andrew, Ansem, Ava, Jake, Lily, Max, and Scott) with originals. Sorry, if I wasn't clear before, however I never said I would get rid of the main canons-just the special children. The question is: if I add them to the canon list will people actually play them?
|
|
